An enormous job that could reshape Dayton could get state funding as part of the Ohio House’s Budget Expense, revealed Tuesday in Columbus.State Rep. Jeff Rezabek(R-Clayton) announced that he had the ability to press through a change to consist of$2.5 countless financing for the Midtown redevelopment project for financial year 2016. The financing would be designated from the state’s General Earnings Fund to the Dayton-Montgomery County Port Authority.That job was one of many that the Dayton Advancement Union placed on their concern list to lobby for state and federal funding.
COLUMBUS, Ohio– Ohio Residence membersare looking to reduce state financing to Akron, Toledo, and Dayton as penalty for their resistance to new statewide traffic-camera limitations.
Under language addedcontributed to the states spending plan costs Tuesday, any cities that remain to defy the new traffic-camera guidelines would lose regionalcity government financing equal to the quantity of fines theyve collected because March 23, when the constraints took impactworked.
Communities with traffic-camera programs would need to submit areport with the state every 3 months testifying that theyre following the brand-new law. Any cities that do not submitsuch a report would lose all their regional government financing until they do.
In 2013, Akron received virtually $1.2 million in traffic-camera fines, according to a city spokeswoman. Toledos cam system generated about $2.2 million last year, while Dayton gathers about $1.5 million in fines every year.
Any state fundingwithheld from a city would be dispersed amongst other regionalcity governments in the exact same county, according to the budget step.
Akron, Dayton, and Toledohave each obtained court rulings obstructing enforcement of the law, which – between other things – requires Ohio communities to station an officer alongside every video camera utilized to release red-light and speeding tickets.
As an outcome, the cities have actually continued to release video camera ticketswithout observing the new rules.
Last month, state Sen. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican politician who sponsored the brand-new law, recommended legislators must cut regionalcity government moneying to any recalcitrant cities to account for their illicit revenuederived from traffic electronic cameras.
Even if they win, they will lose, Seitz said at the time.
Akron spokeswoman Stephanie York specified in an e-mail that it is incredible for lawmakers to strong-arm cities about a law thatcantbe legitimately imposed since of three separate court judgments.
Akrons speed-cameraearnings, York specified, are put into a special fund made use of to spend for things such as safety programs, school crossing guards and bike helmets for children.
If our lawmakers desire to stick up for speeders in school zones, then shame on them, York wrote.
Spokespeople for Dayton and Toledo didnt instantly return e-mails looking for comment.
Watch this story
Kate Baldwin is the business manager for Norwalk Neighborhood Schools, and she’s left in the dark trying to determine how much lawmakers will certainly provide the district.Its like flying a plane without knowing where youre going. We don’t have a location because we don’t understand how much cash we can assign,”Baldwin said.Districts across the state are required to turn in preliminary spending plans Wednesday, but the standoff at the statehouse continues to keep school officials in flux about how much cash they can spend.Norwalk leaders developed $50,000 in cuts this morning.Get rid of personnel [and]
instructors due to the fact that of this? I thinkreview the long run, we wont be able
to include the variety of staff that we desired to in a growing neighborhood and may have an impactan influence on class size,”Norwalk superintendent Denny Wulf said.Democrats are pressing for $150 million in additional financing for K-12 education while Republicans continue to be deadlocked on$100 million.
Currently, the state invests about$2.9 billion on K-12 financing. Whats the holdup? Why cant we get things achieved? I think the holdup is funding. Were going to stay right here until
we get a fair number that is going to work for districts throughout the state of Iowa,”Rep. John Forbes said.Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle do concur on one thing: financing holdup has actually left their constituents frustrated. Im sorry, and Im embarrassed that this
is whats going on,” Sen. Brad Zaun said.Both propositions also include cash for instructor leadership training. The funding is for the monetary year that starts in July.The superintendent, school board members and even students from Des Moines Public Schools will be at the Capitol Wednesday early morning to voice their disappointment over this.City leaders in Norwalk are hiking up propertyreal estate tax to help cover the
financing gap as the deadlock continues.
Florida simply cant trust the federal government to follow up on broadening Medicaid because Washington has actually already deserted funding a present statewide healthcare program, Gov. Rick Scott says.
Scott is indicating the states loss of federal money for safety net hospitals called the Low Earnings Swimming pool. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services made it crystal clear in February 2015 that some $1.3 billion in Floridas LIP funding wont be restored after June 30. That left a billion-dollar hole in Scotts recommended budget, which assumed that LIP cash would be available.
The exact same federal government that provides some money for a program is strollingleaving another health care program, Scott said throughout an April 9 drop in Sarasota. How can you feel comfortable picking up another federal program when they are walkingbowing out an existing program?
The Florida Residence and Senate are currently debating a potential state option to Medicaid expansion, but this claim deals with the specifics of this LIP financing– specifically what it is, how its funded and when Washington told Florida theyd be doing without. The concern sounds complicated, but do not stress, PolitiFact Florida will certainly nurse you through it.
Washington gets out of the swimming pool
LIP money is part of a special arrangement between Florida and Washington called a Section 1115 waiver, and was authorized to deal with a blossoming number of uninsured grownups who could not pay their medical bills. (Some other states have their own 1115 programs to deal with different problems.)
The money primarily goes to safetysafeguard health centers and centers that deal with uninsured and underinsured patients to compensate some of their costs. The LIP fund gets about $1.3 billion, but the whole 1115 waiver program includes other extra programs that together total about $2.2 billion in federal matching funds. Only the LIP cash is at stake here.
These waivers are designed basically as policy experiments. A state has an issue not covered by Medicaid and comes to Washington to assist fund a possible solution. Programs authorized by the feds have a five-year time limitationtime frame, and are subsequently renewed in three-year periods or permitted to end.
Leighton Ku, director of the Center for Health Policy Research study at George Washington University, stated these waiver programs enable states to significantly customize their Medicaid policies and finances, supplied that the functions still serve the underlying function of Medicaid and do not cost the federal government more than it would have spent otherwise.
The LIP started in 2005 and was renewed up until 2013. But when it came time to negotiate another extension for 2014 and beyond, Florida upped the funding demand to a tremendous $4.5 billion to broaden the program. This was after the state refused some $51 billion in Medicaid growth cash over One Decade under the Affordable Care Act, to broaden that program to anyone making up to about 133 percent of the poverty line, as the Obama administration desired. The United States Supreme Court in 2012 ruled states had a choice whether to take the money or not.
On April 11, 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Solutions told the state they were approving the LIP portion of the program for just one more year instead of the normal three-year extension. CMS required Florida to report how well the Medicaid system was working and recommend reforms, and asked the state to improve the system to work without federal LIP payments. The firm did not specifically mention expanding the program per the Affordable Care Act.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Center for Children and Families at the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute, said the federal government had been worried that the LIP program had issues monitoring how the cashthe cash was being invested or how rates were being set, revealed in part by a 2012 General Accounting Office report on transparency. There likewise were concerns about how Florida was matching federal funds, a problem with Medicaid even before the LIP program. The one-year extension in 2014 was notification that the federal government desired Florida to upgrade LIP.
Now quickly forward to 2015: Scott released his budget plan proposition in January assuming that LIP funding, which was set to expire June 30, would be offered. However in February, Eliot Fishman, director of the Children and Adults Health Programs Group in the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Solutions, told an Orlando health care conference audience that there was no wayno chance the program would continue in its present kind.
Fishmans declaration threw Tallahassee into an outcry, as discussions about a $1 billion surplus all of a sudden relied on big gaps in the spending plan. On March 4, Scott sent a letter to President Barack Obama stating the state required the cash to help the uninsured, but the financing was not associated with Medicaid growth in any way.
Scott has actually opposed the Medicaid growth for depending on tax dollars and for requiring the state to assume 10 percent of the larger programs cost by 2020. He recently earned a Complete Flop on our Flip-O-Meter after a brief time of supporting the expansion throughout his re-election campaign. Some have actually suggested Washington is withholding LIP money to strongarm Florida into the growth, a step many doctors oppose since of Medicaid payment limitations, amongst other problems.
In many ways, LIP isn’t really associated with Medicaid growth, Alker said, given that LIP began while Jeb Bush was governor and George W. Bush was president. However a broadened Medicaid would cover many of those patients, or utilize preventive care to keep them out of the hospital to start with, she stated.
Washington and Lee University professor Timothy Jost added that money for the Medicaid growth was ensured by law in the Affordable Care Act, something not real about the program that produced LIP, which is administered as discretionary spending. (Jost supports the health care law.)
Of course, its technically possible the federal government might alter the law to do away with whatever program they such as, consisting of Medicaid. But that would need both residences of Congress and the president to agree on the terms, something that isn’t likely to happen anytime soon, Jost said.
Now Florida deals with a tough set of choices: Discover a brand-new source of LIP funding, end the programaltogether or work out with CMS to either revamp the program orget another extension, potentially for as short as one month. Florida likewise might decide to cover those clients by expanding Medicaid. With the Legislature still in session, specialists stated the result is anyones guess. But Alker stated Scott was being disingenuous for blaming Washington for a problem they cautioned him was looming.
The LIP doesn’t repair the fundamental issue, Alker said. The LIP is simply a Band-Aid for the high rate of uninsured.
Scott stated, The same federal government that offers some money for a program is walking away from another health care program.
He was contrasting Medicaid growth with how the federal government set an end date for funding for the Low Earnings Swimming pool, a program that assists pay healthcare facilities that served uninsured clients.
The federal government did say it would stop spending for the program, so Scott has a point about losing LIP cash. But possible brinkmanship about Medicaid expansion aside, Washington provided a lot of notification it was going to let the experimental LIP program expire. CMS told Florida in April 2014 that it was no longer going to money the current variation of LIP after one more year.
Numerous specialists stated Florida had time to evaluate the program, make changes and address funding. They also raised the point that federal LIP funding is discretionary, while Medicaid cash is guaranteed by law, which is unlikely to alter anytime soon.
We rank the statement Half Real.
Another day in tech, another business tops $100 million in money raised.
Docker, a fast-moving maker of software application for handling applications on an international basis, stated Tuesday that it has actually raised another $95 million. With this fourth round of funding Docker, which 2 years earlier was near extinction, has actually raised about $160 million.
The business decreased to discuss its evaluation, however it is likely worth more than $1 billion, up from $400 million last September, according to a source who was not licensed to speak openly on the problem. However Dockers primarypresident minimized the importance of the brand-new money.
“Financing is a delayed indication. Item announcements are more intriguing, said Benjamin Golub, Docker’s primary executive.
Docker’s financing, however, is an excellent marker of the seriousness felt at many tech companies. The technology facilities of cloud computing systems and mobile devicescell phones is quickly supplanting older forms of computing. That is now forcing older companies to change and new companies to rush so they might possess as much of the market as possible.
Docker is at the center of an open-source job that makes something called “containers,” which allow designers to rapidly make and upgrade software to run harmoniously over a series of clouds, personal computer systems and mobile gadgetscell phones.
The container business was an afterthought in Docker’s original business, however because open sourcing the software it has actually becometurneded into one of the fastest-growing pieces of company software ever. Docker makes moneyearns money by providing premium versions of the open source product, with things like management software application that business desire.
Mr. Golub stated Docker still hasn’t spent all the cash from its second round of funding, not to mention the $40 million it raised in its “C,” or third, round of financing last September.
“We requirehave to be prepared to include employees, include features, and add capability that business are requesting – networking, storage, added security,” he said.
Dockers most recent funding round included financial investments from Goldman Sachs, Coatue Management, Northern Trust, and was led by Understanding Venture Partners. Earlier investors likewise contributed cash.
In February, the Washington State Economic and Earnings Projection Council anticipated the pot industry would generate $221 million throughout the next two-year budget term, though the Home and Senate spending plan proposals expect more.
Republicans want to utilize cannabis revenue to avoid raising taxes while spending for education. Democrats look for to funnel more money into social services and low-income healthcare.
Two years after voters accept an initiative, the Legislature can modify it with an easy bulk vote.
The Republican-led Senate approximates the marijuana market will create about $296 million in the next two years. Save for $8 million a year for the Liquor Control Board and $6 million a year split among cities and counties, that cash will certainly go towards education funding, a concern for the Legislature after the state Supreme Court ruled the state was legally obliged to increase funding to public schools.
The Senate budget presumes that medical cannabis becomes part of the state system. It would condense cannabis taxes to a single tax of 37 percent, paid by the customer when pot is offered.
Rejiggering the tax structure must help cannabis companies, since it would permit them to prevent some federal taxes.
GRAND RAPIDS, MI – A $1.5 million grant from the National Fish and Wildlife Structure might be part of the funding mix for elimination of Grand River dams and restoration of rapids through downtown.
Grand Rapids will apply to belong to the foundations Sustain Our Terrific Lakes program.
The grant might assist fund removal of dams to enhance fish passage and installation of rocks to recreate river fast habitat for lake sturgeon, for example. The city intends to come up with $1.5 million of local cash to match the grant.
There will certainly be personal support, Deputy City Manager Eric DeLong stated. I think we can expect considerable personal support.
bull; Grand River and sea lampreys: US Army Corps might spend $10M on barrier
bull; 4 answers to the $10M question: Why should Grand Rapids buy more riverfront land?
A task supervisor for the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation decreased remarkdiscuss the river job in Grand Rapids. The Sustain Our Excellent Lakes program offers grants of $25,000 to $1.5 million for habitat restoration, and last year provided $1.5 million to a dam elimination project near Traverse City.
Heres a map of other tasks that have gotten Sustain Our Excellent Lakes grants.
Grand Rapids likewise is seeking $10 million from the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund to purchase land along the river, north of I-196, and $10 million from the United States Army Corps of Engineers for a brand-new sea lamprey obstacle farther upstream.
The city has a team of staffers checking out grant opportunities for the project, which has been addedcontributed to the Urban Seas Federal Collaboration.
This is how it will certainly come in, a million here, a million there, DeLong stated. Its altered from an if question to a when and how question.
RELATED: 8 ideas for the future of downtown Grand Rapids
Matt Vande Bunte covers government for MLive/Grand Rapids Press. Email him at firstname.lastname@example.org or follow him on Facebook and twitter.
Allegheny County Controller Chelsa Wagners suggestion that Port Authority make use of an unexpected $2.1 million in vehicle rental tax funds to recover specific bus paths that it eliminated isn’t really that simple, state other county and transit officials.
Ms. Wagner revealed Thursday that Hertz Corp. owes the county an extra $1.44 million in back vehicle rental taxes, charges and interest that it failed to pay from January 2008 through April 2010. Thats on top of $743,107 the business paid in January to cover Might 2010 through June 2011.
Hertz acknowledged in January that it unintentionally paid half of the $2-a-day tax to the state instead of the county in the later period, so Ms.Wagners auditors inspected back up until the initiation of the tax and discovered the business owes added cash. Ms. Wagner called the $1.44 million a conservative estimate that could really be greater.
The automobile rental tax is set aside for transit, and Ms. Wagner advised Allegheny County Council to need the unanticipated $2.1 million to be utilized to bring back Port Authority routes, including one to Baldwin, where the advocacy group Conserve Our Transit has been lobbying for several years for a return of the service. She called utilizing the money because way a win-win for everyone.
However Amie Downs, a spokeswoman for Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, said it would be extraordinary and shortsighted to put that kind of restriction on the money because the firm has other requirements, too.
Port Authority spokesperson Jim Ritchie likewise explained that the countys needed subsidy for the firm is anticipated to increase by about $1 million next year from $28.8 million, allowing Port Authority to get an added $9 million in state funds under the state transportation costs authorized last fall. He added that the company each year reviews whether it needs to broaden service based upon consumer requirement and equity, thinking about whether service would be more of a need in a low-income area.
Another factor is whether the service is financially sustainable, an open question in this case since the Hertz money is a one-time supplement.
Hertz has been paying the right amount to the county since July 2011, when it found an administrative mistake in remitting the tax to the state instead of the county.
Spokesperson Richard Broome said Thursday the company is consciousknows the countys added claim for back taxes but had no further comment.
Mr. Broome said Hertz is challenging whether it needs to pay fines and interest because it wasnt refusing to pay the taxes however paying them to the incorrect location. Michael McCabe, lawyer for Allegheny County Treasurer John Weinstein, said a taxpayer is entitled to an administrative hearing with that workplace if it contests any charge, but he decreased to say whether Hertz is appealing.
An NYPD investigator has actually been suspended after the owner of a deli alleged that he took $3,000 from him during a current cops raid. The Brooklyn deli was the topic of a raid over workers offering loose cigarettes, and two staff members were jailed.
The owner stated the next day he noticed a lot of lease money missing out on and checked the security video. And that video apparently shows one of the investigators involved with the raid taking a big portion of money out of the box and pocketing it.
The investigator in concern has been recognized as Ian Cyrus, and according to the NYPD, he has been suspended and his manager is on customized project.
View ABC Sevens report, consisting of the surveillance video, below:
[image via screengrab]
Follow Josh Feldman on Twitter: @feldmaniac